Multifamily investors spent the last several years waiting for a record wave of new apartments to clear. That shift has started, but it has not reached every market at the same speed.

Demand now exceeds deliveries nationally, construction has fallen to its lowest share of inventory in more than a decade, and rent growth has begun to improve. Several high-supply metros still rely on concessions to hold occupancy, while markets with fewer new units have regained pricing power sooner.

The eight markets below stand out because renter demand is absorbing available units while future deliveries are becoming more manageable. We compared vacancy, rent growth, absorption, construction, employment, transaction activity, and operating risk to find markets where owners may have a clearer path to stronger occupancy and net operating income.

Build a Stronger Rental Property Business

Subscribe to our 2X weekly newsletter to learn more about managing tenants, protecting cash flow, improving rental operations, and making better real estate investment decisions.

Apartment Demand Has Finally Moved Ahead of Deliveries

The national multifamily market entered the second half of 2026 with a better supply-demand balance than it had during the previous several years. The Cushman & Wakefield Q2 2026 U.S. Multifamily MarketBeat reported 124,600 units of second-quarter net absorption, the fifth-highest quarterly total in almost 25 years. Demand reached approximately 208,000 units during the first half, while quarterly deliveries fell 27% from a year earlier.

The change matters because absorption exceeded new supply over the trailing four quarters for the first time since early 2022. Cushman & Wakefield measured roughly 362,000 absorbed units against about 358,000 deliveries. Its national vacancy rate fell 35 basis points during the quarter to 8.9%, and annual asking-rent growth accelerated from 1.1% in the first quarter to 1.5% in the second.

Construction should provide additional relief. Developers had approximately 475,000 units underway at midyear, equal to 3.5% of existing inventory. That share has fallen by more than half from its early-2023 peak and now stands at its lowest level since 2013. High financing costs, construction expenses, and stricter equity requirements have reduced new starts, so the delivery pipeline should continue shrinking into 2027.

Other research firms measure a different apartment universe and therefore report different vacancy and rent figures. The Yardi Matrix June 2026 national report placed average occupancy at 94.1% and annual advertised asking-rent growth at only 0.2%. New York and San Francisco led its major markets, while Austin, Denver, Tampa, and Phoenix continued to record annual rent declines. The contrast shows how sharply supply conditions still divide coastal and Midwestern markets from many Sun Belt metros.

The CBRE Q1 2026 U.S. Multifamily Figures measured 4.8% vacancy, 78,100 absorbed units, and 58,100 completed units. CBRE also reported $29.5 billion of first-quarter multifamily investment volume, down 6% from a year earlier. Its lower vacancy rate reflects different property coverage and market definitions rather than a direct contradiction of Cushman & Wakefield’s figures.

Rental demand also receives support from the high cost of homeownership. In its 2026 multifamily outlook, CBRE estimated that buying carried a 105% monthly premium over renting and noted that renewals represented 57% of apartment leasing activity. Those conditions help owners retain residents, but they do not eliminate affordability pressure. Operators still need to balance renewal increases against turnover, concessions, bad debt, and household income.

The strongest 2026 investment case therefore does not rest on a broad claim that apartments always perform well. It rests on markets where demand already matches or exceeds supply, rent growth has returned, AI is positively affecting office use, and buyers can underwrite operating costs without depending on an immediate drop in interest rates.

Why the 5-Year Treasury Could Keep Mortgages High

How the Markets Were Evaluated

This report examines professionally managed apartment communities rather than single-family rentals, duplexes, or small apartment buildings. The main dataset tracks properties with more than 50 units, which keeps the comparison centered on institutional and middle-market multifamily fundamentals.

The Cushman & Wakefield Q2 2026 U.S. Multifamily MarketBeat provides the common baseline for the ranking. Its market tables report vacancy, absorption, asking rents, existing inventory, deliveries, and units under construction across approximately 90 metropolitan areas. Cushman & Wakefield derives the figures from CoStar data and its managed portfolio, then limits the dataset to properties with more than 50 units.

That common baseline matters because apartment research firms often measure different property universes. One source may report stabilized occupancy for professionally managed properties, while another reports total vacancy across a wider set of buildings. The chart therefore uses only Cushman & Wakefield figures. We added the first- and second-quarter absorption totals to calculate first-half demand, and we compared second-quarter 2025 asking rents with second-quarter 2026 asking rents to calculate annual growth.

One inconsistency required a specific adjustment. Cushman & Wakefield’s narrative summary lists 19,500 absorbed units for New York during the first half, while the detailed quarterly table totals 12,702 units. The chart uses the table total because that calculation applies the same row-level method to every market. We retained the discrepancy in the methodology so readers can see why the ranking does not use the higher figure.

We then tested the baseline results against Yardi Matrix’s June 2026 national report, local Yardi reports, CBRE’s 2026 multifamily outlook, and local research from Colliers and Marcus & Millichap. Those sources added context on stabilized occupancy, concessions, renewals, transaction volume, price per unit, submarket differences, and operating risks that the national table does not capture.

The demographic and labor review drew on the Census Bureau’s Vintage 2025 metropolitan estimates and Bureau of Labor Statistics metropolitan employment data. Population and employment strengthened a market’s case only when the property data supported the same conclusion. Fast population growth did not outweigh a construction pipeline that continued to suppress occupancy or effective rents.

Five categories shaped the comparison:

1. Property fundamentals — 35%. Vacancy, stabilized occupancy, rent growth, concessions, lease renewals, and absorption.
2. Supply conditions — 20%. Recent deliveries, units under construction, construction as a share of inventory, and the likely direction of future completions.
3. Economic and demographic demand — 20%. Employment, household formation, population trends, renter depth, and barriers to homeownership.
4. Investment conditions — 15%. Transaction volume, price per unit, buyer liquidity, financing access, and the range of viable acquisition strategies.
5. Market risks — 10%. Regulation, property taxes, insurance, expense growth, industry concentration, affordability pressure, and dependence on continued migration.

These weights organized the analysis rather than generating a fixed numerical score. Geographic boundaries, property definitions, regulatory exposure, and operating costs do not reduce cleanly to one comparable number. The final order also reflects whether recent rent gains appear durable, whether the remaining supply can clear without prolonged concessions, and whether acquisition pricing leaves room for a slower recovery.

Treat the ranking as a market screen, not a substitute for underwriting. Submarket supply, building age, resident income, unit mix, taxes, insurance, deferred maintenance, debt structure, and purchase price can outweigh the metro-level result.

The 8 Best Multifamily Investment Markets for 2026

Market	Vacancy	YoY Rent	H1 Abs.	Key Risk
1. Chicago	5.5%	+3.5%	+1.8K	Taxes and uneven job growth
2. New York	3.5%	+3.9%	+12.7K	Regulation and high entry cost
3. San Francisco	3.7%	+12.9%	+1.1K	Pricing and regulatory exposure
4. Milwaukee	4.4%	+3.1%	+1.7K	Softer high-end submarkets
5. Philadelphia	6.8%	+2.3%	+3.6K	City costs and thin liquidity
6. Twin Cities	6.3%	+2.8%	+2.8K	Slower employment growth
7. Norfolk–Virginia Beach	5.4%	+5.6%	+1.1K	Climate and employer density
8. Kansas City	8.6%	+3.2%	+2.8K	Pipeline and weak job growth

The chart uses Cushman & Wakefield’s Q2 2026 apartment inventory. Local reports may show different figures because they cover different unit counts, property ages, classes, or geographic boundaries.

1. Chicago

Chicago takes the top position because it combines strong rent growth, high stabilized occupancy, a manageable pipeline, and enough transaction activity to support several investment strategies.

Cushman & Wakefield reported 5.5% vacancy, an average monthly asking rent of $2,127, and 3.5% annual rent growth. The market absorbed approximately 1,836 units during the first half of 2026. Developers delivered 2,847 units and had 8,713 under construction, equal to about 2.5% of the existing apartment inventory.

The Yardi Matrix Chicago multifamily report strengthens the case. Yardi measured 96% stabilized occupancy and 3.3% annual advertised rent growth through April, placing Chicago behind only New York and San Francisco among its 30 major markets. Investors completed approximately $1.8 billion in multifamily sales during the first four months of 2026, $700 million more than during the same period in 2025.

Chicago also offers more pricing and strategy options than the expensive coastal markets ranked below it. Investors can pursue stabilized urban assets, suburban garden communities, or value-add properties without relying entirely on trophy pricing. Education and health services continued to add jobs even as the metro’s overall unemployment rate remained above the national rate.

The market’s scale can hide major differences. Downtown Class A properties, neighborhood apartments, and suburban communities face different supply, taxes, and renter profiles. Cook County assessments and local property taxes can materially change operating income after an acquisition, especially when a sale triggers a reassessment or the prior owner benefited from a lower basis.

Best fit: Well-located Class B and B-plus communities, stabilized suburban properties, and value-add acquisitions where renovation costs remain supportable at local rents.

Main risk: Investors need conservative tax and expense assumptions. Strong rent growth will not offset an acquisition that understates property taxes, utilities, insurance, or capital needs.

2. New York

New York offers the tightest large-market fundamentals in the ranking, but regulation and acquisition pricing keep it below Chicago.

Cushman & Wakefield measured 3.5% vacancy and 3.9% annual asking-rent growth. The market absorbed approximately 12,700 units during the first half, the largest total among the eight ranked markets. Developers delivered 12,876 units and had 44,246 under construction, equal to about 5.3% of inventory. Strong demand has so far kept pace with that pipeline.

The Yardi Matrix Manhattan multifamily report recorded 98.2% stabilized occupancy in February. Through March, annual rent growth reached 4.5% in Manhattan and 4.2% across New York City. Yardi also tracked more than 16,500 Manhattan units under construction, with conversions accounting for a meaningful share of planned supply.

New York benefits from a deep renter pool, extremely high barriers to homeownership, extensive transit, and a broad employment base. These factors support both stabilized luxury assets and more moderately priced apartments in outer-borough and suburban submarkets. The market also provides substantial transaction liquidity when sellers and buyers agree on pricing.

Regulation creates the principal constraint. New York City states that almost half of its rental apartments fall under rent stabilization, and the city’s Rent Guidelines Board controls renewal increases for those units. Investors must identify every regulated apartment, legal rent, preferential rent, tax benefit, compliance obligation, and potential capital restriction before underwriting income growth.

Best fit: Market-rate properties with clear regulatory status, transit-oriented assets, and buildings where operational improvements do not depend on aggressive resident displacement or uncertain deregulation.

Main risk: A strong market cannot cure a flawed regulatory assumption. Investors should treat rent-stabilized and market-rate units as different income streams and underwrite legal, compliance, insurance, and capital costs separately.

3. San Francisco

San Francisco has produced the country’s most dramatic apartment rent recovery, while limited deliveries have tightened vacancy quickly.

Cushman & Wakefield reported 3.7% vacancy, down from 5.9% a year earlier. Its average asking rent increased from $3,644 to $4,113, a 12.9% annual gain. The market absorbed approximately 1,132 units during the first half, recorded no deliveries in the firm’s defined inventory, and had only 3,644 units under construction.

The Yardi Matrix San Francisco multifamily report uses a broader inventory and reports a more moderate result. Yardi measured 4.5% annual advertised rent growth through May and 95.9% occupancy in April. Developers added 832 units through May and had 11,639 under construction. The firms disagree on the magnitude because they use different geographies and property sets, but both show improving occupancy, rising rents, and a slower supply cycle.

Technology and artificial-intelligence companies have begun to improve the employment outlook after a long contraction. San Francisco also benefits from severe barriers to new construction and an ownership market that remains far less affordable than renting for many households.

Investors still face significant operational constraints. Purchase prices, taxes, insurance, seismic work, building systems, and tenant protections can consume much of the apparent rent upside. The strongest recent growth may also reflect recovery from unusually weak prior years rather than a rate that owners can repeat.

Best fit: Well-maintained market-rate properties, transit-accessible communities, and recapitalized assets whose purchase basis supports conservative rent and capital assumptions.

Main risk: Do not capitalize one year of sharp rent growth as a permanent trend. Regulation, physical building risk, and high operating costs require a larger margin of safety than the vacancy rate alone suggests.

4. Milwaukee

Milwaukee ranks fourth because it pairs low vacancy and solid rent growth with attainable acquisition pricing and unusually strong resident retention.

Cushman & Wakefield measured 4.4% vacancy, down from 6.8% a year earlier. Average asking rents increased 3.1% to $1,622. The market absorbed approximately 1,721 units in the first half while developers delivered only 313. Another 3,645 units remained under construction, equal to roughly 4.4% of inventory.

The Marcus & Millichap Q2 2026 Milwaukee multifamily report found that vacancy had remained in the low-4% range for three years. Only about 8.5% of units offered concessions, compared with 17% nationally, and renewal conversions approached 71%, far above the 56% U.S. average.

Milwaukee’s high cost of homeownership relative to local incomes keeps many households in the renter pool. The market also gives investors a lower entry basis than Chicago, New York, or San Francisco. That can support Class B and C renovation strategies when owners keep total housing costs within reach of local wages.

The opportunity does not extend evenly across the metro. Marcus & Millichap identified softer Class A demand in the central business district and parts of the northern suburbs, while attainable units showed stronger performance. Recent development can also create temporary concessions at the upper end even when the overall market remains tight.

Best fit: Attainable Class B and C communities, suburban workforce housing, and selective value-add properties where renovations improve operations without pushing rents beyond local incomes.

Main risk: Investors should separate the strong middle-market renter base from weaker luxury lease-up conditions. Slow population and employment growth can limit the depth of demand for high-end units.

5. Philadelphia

Philadelphia offers balanced occupancy, moderate rent growth, low forward construction, and a purchase basis below New York and Boston.

Cushman & Wakefield reported 6.8% vacancy, down from 7.5% a year earlier. Asking rents increased 2.3% to $1,910. The market absorbed approximately 3,558 units during the first half, while developers delivered 2,301 and had 6,599 under construction. The active pipeline equaled only about 2.1% of inventory.

The Yardi Matrix Philadelphia multifamily report measured 95.4% stabilized occupancy and reported that employment expanded 1.4% in 2025. The metro added 37,400 jobs, with education and health services accounting for most of the gains. That industry base can support steady apartment demand even when faster-growth sectors slow.

Philadelphia also gives investors several distinct options. Center City luxury properties, university-adjacent housing, suburban garden communities, and workforce apartments operate under different supply and rent dynamics. The broad inventory and lower pricing relative to nearby gateway markets can create a more workable yield for private investors.

Transaction liquidity remains a concern. Yardi recorded only $60 million in first-quarter apartment sales, and the market had completed more than 17,000 units during the preceding two years. Investors also need to account for city real estate taxes, transfer taxes, licensing, utilities, and older-building capital requirements.

Best fit: Stabilized Class B communities, suburban garden apartments, and properties near health care, education, transit, and durable employment centers.

Main risk: Underwrite city and suburban assets separately. Taxes, transaction costs, aging systems, and thin recent sales volume can offset the benefit of a lower purchase price.

6. Twin Cities

Minneapolis–St. Paul combines stable occupancy, above-average rent growth, moderate construction, and a meaningful value-add transaction market.

Cushman & Wakefield measured 6.3% vacancy and 2.8% annual asking-rent growth. The market absorbed approximately 2,774 units during the first half, slightly more than the 2,318 units delivered. Another 6,020 units remained under construction, equal to about 2.7% of inventory.

The Yardi Matrix Twin Cities multifamily report recorded 95.2% stabilized occupancy and 2.5% annual rent growth through March. The metro completed $415 million in multifamily sales during the first quarter. A value-add-heavy transaction mix reduced the average price per unit to $136,815, well below the national average reported by Yardi.

The region’s diversified employers, health care systems, manufacturers, universities, and government institutions support a deep renter base. Transit investments and suburban employment nodes also give investors several submarkets rather than one dominant urban core.

Employment growth slowed to 0.7% in 2025, and the metro’s unemployment rate moved above the national rate in early 2026. Those conditions may limit aggressive rent growth, particularly in properties serving renters with less income flexibility. Owners also need to account for winter operating costs, taxes, and differences between Minneapolis, St. Paul, and suburban jurisdictions.

Best fit: Value-add garden communities, well-located Class B properties, and suburban assets near medical, manufacturing, and transit-supported employment.

Main risk: Do not rely on broad metro averages. Municipal rules, taxes, utility costs, and renter incomes vary substantially across the region.

7. Norfolk–Virginia Beach

Norfolk–Virginia Beach enters the ranking because rent growth has accelerated while limited construction protects existing inventory.

Cushman & Wakefield reported 5.4% vacancy, down from 5.6% a year earlier, and 5.6% annual asking-rent growth to $1,688. The market absorbed approximately 1,134 units during the first half. Developers delivered only 132 units and had 2,359 under construction, equal to about 2% of inventory.

The Marcus & Millichap Norfolk–Virginia Beach multifamily report found that most major submarkets reduced vacancy by at least 100 basis points during 2025. The report credits tourism, shipbuilding, military contracts, and reduced supply pressure for supporting demand, while noting weaker conditions in some heavy-industry locations.

The broader Colliers 2026 Mid-Year Virginia Multifamily Report also describes Hampton Roads as an active investor market supported by distinctive employers and industries. The metro’s lower rents and acquisition costs can appeal to buyers seeking yield outside expensive East Coast gateways.

The economy relies heavily on defense, ports, shipbuilding, tourism, and government activity. Those industries provide durable employment but also create concentration risk. Coastal flooding, wind exposure, insurance, drainage, and building resilience require property-specific analysis.

Best fit: Stabilized workforce communities near military, shipbuilding, medical, port, and tourism employment, particularly assets with manageable insurance and flood exposure.

Main risk: Investors should price climate resilience and insurance before they price rent growth. One submarket’s military or tourism strength may not protect a property exposed to flooding or a weakening industrial employer.

8. Kansas City

Kansas City completes the ranking because rent growth and absorption remain positive while the market offers a comparatively affordable investment basis.

Cushman & Wakefield measured 8.6% vacancy, unchanged from the first quarter and slightly below the rate a year earlier. Average asking rents increased 3.2% to $1,442. The market absorbed approximately 2,776 units during the first half, more than the 2,473 units delivered. Developers had 5,812 units under construction, equal to roughly 3.6% of inventory.

The Yardi Matrix Kansas City multifamily report recorded 94.5% stabilized occupancy and 2.5% annual advertised rent growth early in 2026. Multifamily sales reached approximately $1.1 billion during 2025, showing that the market can support meaningful transaction volume even though it remains smaller than Chicago or New York.

Kansas City provides a broad selection of urban, suburban, and workforce properties at rents that remain relatively affordable. Education and health services continue to add jobs, and major data-center and infrastructure investment may support selected employment corridors.

The market still carries more vacancy and construction risk than the seven markets above it. Yardi reported subdued job growth and losses in professional services and trade-related sectors. Investors should not assume that all 5,800 units under construction will lease without concessions, especially where several projects target the same high-income renters.

Best fit: Moderately priced suburban communities, Class B value-add properties, and assets near health care, logistics, government, and established employment nodes.

Main risk: The current pipeline leaves limited room for aggressive Class A underwriting. Focus on submarkets where existing occupancy and resident incomes already support the business plan.

Three Multifamily Markets Worth Watching

Boise

Boise’s vacancy rate fell to 8.8% in the second quarter, while annual asking-rent growth reached 3.7%. The market absorbed 1,318 units during the first half and had only 903 units under construction. It missed the ranking because the recent delivery cycle still affects occupancy and the smaller investment market can produce volatile pricing.

Charleston

Charleston cut vacancy from 12.4% to 8.4% in one year and generated 2.7% rent growth. Demand absorbed about 2,010 units during the first half, more than twice the 930 units delivered. The recovery is compelling, but 3,080 units remain under construction in a market with roughly 70,800 units, so owners still face lease-up competition.

Reno

Reno recorded 6.3% vacancy, 4.2% annual rent growth, no first-half deliveries, and only 65 units under construction. Those numbers create a strong supply case. The market remained outside the top eight because its smaller inventory, economic concentration, and limited transaction depth can amplify both gains and setbacks.

What Could Change the Rankings

The Remaining Pipeline Could Clear Faster Than Expected

Sun Belt markets led first-half absorption, and several formerly oversupplied metros reduced vacancy sharply during the second quarter. Austin, Phoenix, Atlanta, Charlotte, and other high-delivery markets could move up quickly if demand continues to outpace a shrinking pipeline. Investors should watch concessions and effective rents rather than waiting for asking rents alone to turn positive.

Employment Could Weaken Renter Household Formation

Apartment demand has exceeded what recent job growth would normally predict. That resilience may not continue if employers cut payrolls, recent graduates struggle to find work, or renters double up to reduce costs. Markets with diversified health care, government, education, and service employment should handle a slowdown better than metros tied to one cyclical industry.

Financing Could Improve Transaction Volume

CBRE expects stable multifamily cap rates in 2026 and gradual compression later if interest rates, inflation, and debt markets become more predictable. More lender competition could narrow the buyer-seller pricing gap and increase sales. It could also raise property values before operating fundamentals fully improve.

Operating Expenses Could Outrun Rents

Insurance, taxes, payroll, utilities, repairs, and contract services continue to pressure net operating income. A market can produce 3% rent growth while an owner loses margin because expenses increase faster. Investors should compare revenue growth with controllable and noncontrollable costs rather than treating rent growth as a return forecast.

Regulation Could Redirect Capital

Rent regulation, tenant protections, inspection requirements, energy mandates, and local fees differ widely among the ranked markets. New York and San Francisco offer exceptionally tight fundamentals but require a regulatory discount. Chicago, Philadelphia, and the Twin Cities also demand careful tax and municipal analysis. A lower-regulation market may attract more buyers even when its operating data look weaker.

Homeownership Conditions Could Change

High mortgage rates and home prices currently keep many households in apartments. A meaningful drop in borrowing costs could help some renters buy, but limited for-sale inventory and the large monthly premium to own should continue supporting renewals in the near term. The effect will vary by renter income and submarket.

How Investors Should Use the Ranking

Start by defining the apartment strategy. A newly built Class A property, a stabilized suburban community, a workforce-housing acquisition, and a heavy value-add project require different market conditions.

Then move from the metro to the submarket. Review existing vacancy, concessions, units under construction, planned deliveries, employment access, schools, transportation, crime, and competing renovations. A metro with 5% vacancy can contain a lease-up corridor where owners offer several weeks of free rent.

Examine the rent roll and operating history. Focus on:

• Renewal and new-lease rent changes
• Concessions and net effective rents
• Delinquency, bad debt, and evictions
• Resident turnover and retention
• Utility reimbursements
• Payroll and contract services
• Insurance and real estate taxes
• Near-term capital expenditures
• Unit mix and renovation premiums

Do not rely on average asking rents to support a renovation plan. Compare achievable renovated rents with competing properties and resident incomes. Estimate the number of units that can absorb a higher price, not merely the rent that the newest building advertises.

Normalize expenses before you calculate value. A seller may benefit from an old tax assessment, below-market insurance policy, deferred repairs, owner-managed payroll, or temporary utility savings. Replace those figures with costs that a new owner can reasonably expect.

Stress-test the debt. Model slower lease-up, lower renovation premiums, higher insurance and taxes, increased concessions, refinancing at a higher rate, and a wider exit cap rate. Multifamily demand can remain strong while a highly leveraged acquisition produces a weak return.

Finally, evaluate liquidity. Large gateway and primary markets offer more buyers and lenders, but they often require lower yields and expose investors to more regulation. Secondary markets may provide better going-in returns, but they can take longer to finance or sell. Match the market to your hold period, capital structure, and tolerance for operational complexity.

Where Multifamily Investors Can Find the Strongest Balance

The apartment cycle has started to turn. Demand now exceeds deliveries nationally, and the shrinking construction pipeline should remove more supply pressure through 2027. The improvement is real, but it remains uneven enough that investors still need to distinguish durable occupancy gains from temporary lease-up relief.

Chicago offers the broadest balance of rent growth, occupancy, manageable supply, and transaction depth. New York and San Francisco deliver tighter fundamentals but require investors to absorb higher pricing and more regulatory exposure. Milwaukee, Philadelphia, and the Twin Cities provide steadier operating conditions at more attainable acquisition costs. Norfolk–Virginia Beach and Kansas City can offer stronger going-in yields when investors choose submarkets carefully and price local risks correctly.

Market position matters less than the relationship among purchase basis, debt, operating expenses, building condition, resident income, and the immediate competitive set. A lower-ranked metro can produce the better investment when those factors align.

In 2026, the stronger multifamily opportunities will appear where renter demand can clear the remaining supply without forcing owners to depend on aggressive rent increases or cheaper refinancing.

The 9 Strongest Retail Property Markets for 2026